<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Run a Successful Silent Auction (Part II)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/fundraising-events/silent-auction-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/fundraising-events/silent-auction-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Tools and information for schools, churches, and other non-profits...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:23:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Garecht</title>
		<link>http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/fundraising-events/silent-auction-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-22277</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Garecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/?p=236#comment-22277</guid>
		<description>Susan,

Thanks for your comments / questions!  Glad the site has been helpful to you.  

Regarding the bidsheets - perhaps I should have clarified better: when I say &quot;carbonless&quot; bidsheets, what I am referring to are three-part sheets that DO transfer the information through all three (write on one and it presses through onto all three) through a carbon-paper system, but where sheets of carbon-paper aren&#039;t required (such as these sheets here:  http://www.ncrforms.com/ )  --- I&#039;m not endorsing that vendor, just including it as an example -- so, the information would in fact transfer onto all three sheets.

No, I would still give out or mail a receipt.  

Regarding your idea for grouping the winning bids by name, I like it, and it would work, depending on the auction.  For large (very large) auctions, I always suggest closing the sections out one at a time, and thus, it may prove harder to to that, given that they bidsheets will be coming back (and sometimes paid) at different times, but it would seem to add some streamline to the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments / questions!  Glad the site has been helpful to you.  </p>
<p>Regarding the bidsheets &#8211; perhaps I should have clarified better: when I say &#8220;carbonless&#8221; bidsheets, what I am referring to are three-part sheets that DO transfer the information through all three (write on one and it presses through onto all three) through a carbon-paper system, but where sheets of carbon-paper aren&#8217;t required (such as these sheets here:  <a href="http://www.ncrforms.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncrforms.com/</a> )  &#8212; I&#8217;m not endorsing that vendor, just including it as an example &#8212; so, the information would in fact transfer onto all three sheets.</p>
<p>No, I would still give out or mail a receipt.  </p>
<p>Regarding your idea for grouping the winning bids by name, I like it, and it would work, depending on the auction.  For large (very large) auctions, I always suggest closing the sections out one at a time, and thus, it may prove harder to to that, given that they bidsheets will be coming back (and sometimes paid) at different times, but it would seem to add some streamline to the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/fundraising-events/silent-auction-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-22240</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/?p=236#comment-22240</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m wondering if you can explain, in more detail, how the 3-part carbonless bid-sheet system works.  I like the idea of giving the winning bidder a copy at check-out, but I don&#039;t understand how, if there&#039;s no carbon, the other two sheets would have any of the pertinent info as to the winning bidder and amount.   Or is this just so that the auction runners can find the item(s)?  And if that&#039;s the case, what is the purpose for the 3rd copy?  This will be our 3rd silent auction, and we&#039;ve always just sent each bidder/donor/sponsor a tax receipt at year-end.   You&#039;re not suggesting that the bid sheet marked &quot;paid&quot; would suffice for tax purposes, or does it? 

Another question regarding the check-out process:  last year, we took a few minutes after all of the bidding was closed to sort all of the bid sheets by the name of the winning bidder, stapled them together, and then calculated the total owed by each - it seemed to streamline the check-out process a bit.  I know that this wouldn&#039;t work with your multi-copy bid sheet system, but other than that, what do you think of that idea?  

Thank you for the wealth of info you&#039;ve compiled on this site - it was all extremely helpful!
Susan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wondering if you can explain, in more detail, how the 3-part carbonless bid-sheet system works.  I like the idea of giving the winning bidder a copy at check-out, but I don&#8217;t understand how, if there&#8217;s no carbon, the other two sheets would have any of the pertinent info as to the winning bidder and amount.   Or is this just so that the auction runners can find the item(s)?  And if that&#8217;s the case, what is the purpose for the 3rd copy?  This will be our 3rd silent auction, and we&#8217;ve always just sent each bidder/donor/sponsor a tax receipt at year-end.   You&#8217;re not suggesting that the bid sheet marked &#8220;paid&#8221; would suffice for tax purposes, or does it? </p>
<p>Another question regarding the check-out process:  last year, we took a few minutes after all of the bidding was closed to sort all of the bid sheets by the name of the winning bidder, stapled them together, and then calculated the total owed by each &#8211; it seemed to streamline the check-out process a bit.  I know that this wouldn&#8217;t work with your multi-copy bid sheet system, but other than that, what do you think of that idea?  </p>
<p>Thank you for the wealth of info you&#8217;ve compiled on this site &#8211; it was all extremely helpful!<br />
Susan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Garecht</title>
		<link>http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/fundraising-events/silent-auction-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-19117</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Garecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/?p=236#comment-19117</guid>
		<description>Kellie,

Thanks for your question!   First of all, I love the sign-up party idea.  Good one!

For the party winners, I would suggest that you either have a book of receipts that the check out folks can write out on the spot, or, even better, require the winners to write their name and e-mail address on the bidsheet, and place a note on the item  saying that receipts will be e-mailed to the luck winners the day after the event.

Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kellie,</p>
<p>Thanks for your question!   First of all, I love the sign-up party idea.  Good one!</p>
<p>For the party winners, I would suggest that you either have a book of receipts that the check out folks can write out on the spot, or, even better, require the winners to write their name and e-mail address on the bidsheet, and place a note on the item  saying that receipts will be e-mailed to the luck winners the day after the event.</p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kellie</title>
		<link>http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/fundraising-events/silent-auction-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-18784</link>
		<dc:creator>kellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 22:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/?p=236#comment-18784</guid>
		<description>Very useful site - thanks for all the ideas!  I have a procedural question regarding check-out.  In addition to silent and live auction items, we also have sign up parties (i.e., Mardi Gras party for 25 people at $25 each).  With the silent and live items, we have multi-part bid sheets; we keep one and give one to the winner for tax records.  How do you suggest handling this for a sign up party?  You can&#039;t really have 20 or 25 part sheets - does anyone have any suggestions?  Thanks so much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very useful site &#8211; thanks for all the ideas!  I have a procedural question regarding check-out.  In addition to silent and live auction items, we also have sign up parties (i.e., Mardi Gras party for 25 people at $25 each).  With the silent and live items, we have multi-part bid sheets; we keep one and give one to the winner for tax records.  How do you suggest handling this for a sign up party?  You can&#8217;t really have 20 or 25 part sheets &#8211; does anyone have any suggestions?  Thanks so much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KG</title>
		<link>http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/fundraising-events/silent-auction-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-15575</link>
		<dc:creator>KG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/?p=236#comment-15575</guid>
		<description>Used items were included in our charity garage sale, but I wasn&#039;t sure beyond that type of fundraiser.  So, I really appreciate your advice on that matter and on how to incorporate on-site credit card transactions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Used items were included in our charity garage sale, but I wasn&#8217;t sure beyond that type of fundraiser.  So, I really appreciate your advice on that matter and on how to incorporate on-site credit card transactions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Garecht</title>
		<link>http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/fundraising-events/silent-auction-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-15485</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Garecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 18:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/?p=236#comment-15485</guid>
		<description>KG,  

Thanks for your questions!  

1) Generally, I have found that new items work best, unless the used items are truly outstanding (e.g. a nice used car or something like that).  Also, the used items may work for certain organizations in certain areas.  As I said, though, generally the items will need to be new to sell really well.  For used items, you may want to hold a non-profit &quot;yard sale&quot; instead, where all proceeds go to the organization.

2) Yes, you are right, transaction fees cut into the amount raised through silent auctions, but I have found that it is more than made up for because so many more people are willing to bid higher amounts if they can put it on plastic.

One great option for on-site credit card transactions is Square (https://squareup.com/)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KG,  </p>
<p>Thanks for your questions!  </p>
<p>1) Generally, I have found that new items work best, unless the used items are truly outstanding (e.g. a nice used car or something like that).  Also, the used items may work for certain organizations in certain areas.  As I said, though, generally the items will need to be new to sell really well.  For used items, you may want to hold a non-profit &#8220;yard sale&#8221; instead, where all proceeds go to the organization.</p>
<p>2) Yes, you are right, transaction fees cut into the amount raised through silent auctions, but I have found that it is more than made up for because so many more people are willing to bid higher amounts if they can put it on plastic.</p>
<p>One great option for on-site credit card transactions is Square (<a href="https://squareup.com/" rel="nofollow">https://squareup.com/</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KG</title>
		<link>http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/fundraising-events/silent-auction-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-15357</link>
		<dc:creator>KG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 05:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/?p=236#comment-15357</guid>
		<description>Hi Joe! Thanks for the excellent guide. Perhaps you can help clear up a couple of factors for me:

1) New items are great for a silent auction, but can gently &quot;used&quot; items be offered as well? What&#039;s a good approach for presenting these used items in the auction? Or do attendees usually assume that some items are donated ones, which are possibly used?

2) You mention taking credit cards at large silent auctions. Transaction fees cut into donation offerings. What are affordable options for nonprofits when doing on-site, credit card transactions?

Thanks for your help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joe! Thanks for the excellent guide. Perhaps you can help clear up a couple of factors for me:</p>
<p>1) New items are great for a silent auction, but can gently &#8220;used&#8221; items be offered as well? What&#8217;s a good approach for presenting these used items in the auction? Or do attendees usually assume that some items are donated ones, which are possibly used?</p>
<p>2) You mention taking credit cards at large silent auctions. Transaction fees cut into donation offerings. What are affordable options for nonprofits when doing on-site, credit card transactions?</p>
<p>Thanks for your help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Garecht</title>
		<link>http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/fundraising-events/silent-auction-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-14993</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Garecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 18:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/?p=236#comment-14993</guid>
		<description>Jean Paul, thanks for your comment / questions!

While the number of items to have depends on your audience, for 100-150 people I would suggest having around 30-50 items to bid on.  Valentine&#039;s day is an interesting day to hold the event!  I would try to put together lots of &quot;couples&quot; packages (nights out, spa days, getaways) to capitalize on the fact that lots of couples will likely attend the event together and be in a romantic mood that evening.

Best of luck with the event!

Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jean Paul, thanks for your comment / questions!</p>
<p>While the number of items to have depends on your audience, for 100-150 people I would suggest having around 30-50 items to bid on.  Valentine&#8217;s day is an interesting day to hold the event!  I would try to put together lots of &#8220;couples&#8221; packages (nights out, spa days, getaways) to capitalize on the fact that lots of couples will likely attend the event together and be in a romantic mood that evening.</p>
<p>Best of luck with the event!</p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jean paul bouchard</title>
		<link>http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/fundraising-events/silent-auction-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-14943</link>
		<dc:creator>jean paul bouchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/?p=236#comment-14943</guid>
		<description>hi,
we having a fund raising on february and i was wondering how many items we should present to our audience,[100-150 peoples] and since it&#039;ll be february 14th
valentine day what type of items we should forcast
thank you
jean paul [vancouver canada]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,<br />
we having a fund raising on february and i was wondering how many items we should present to our audience,[100-150 peoples] and since it&#8217;ll be february 14th<br />
valentine day what type of items we should forcast<br />
thank you<br />
jean paul [vancouver canada]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Garecht</title>
		<link>http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/fundraising-events/silent-auction-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-14188</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Garecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 03:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefundraisingauthority.com/?p=236#comment-14188</guid>
		<description>Kim,

Thanks for your comment.  While I have seen both work, I recommend using names, not numbers, just to simplify the process.  Yes, I think in person visits to obtain auction items work --- in fact, I have seen it happen quite often, with great success!

Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment.  While I have seen both work, I recommend using names, not numbers, just to simplify the process.  Yes, I think in person visits to obtain auction items work &#8212; in fact, I have seen it happen quite often, with great success!</p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

